SQLitePCL.raw is a Portable Class Library (PCL) for low-level (raw) access to SQLite. This package does not provide an API which is friendly to app developers. Rather, it provides an API which handles platform and configuration issues, upon which a friendlier API can be built. In order to use this package, you will need to also add one of the SQLitePCLRaw.provider.* packages and call raw.SetProvider(). Convenience packages are named SQLitePCLRaw.bundle_*.
NEW Micro-Seasons Unlock Hidden Profits. Seasonality 2.0 takes the concept to the next level by applying seasonality to lower timeframes, creating Micro-Seasons!Whether you want to see if a security has a monthly, weekly, daily or even hourly trading tendency, this new feature shows you what a market is poised to do based on historical seasonal behavior. Polycab 2.5 Sqmm, 4 core 2Xwy Copper Xlpe Insu. Armoured Str Cable 1.1Kv As Per Is 7098(Part 1) 1988 ₹ 191.1 ₹ 110.8 Per Meter (42% OFF) ₹ 130.7 (Incl.
For projects that support PackageReference, copy this XML node into the project file to reference the package.
The NuGet Team does not provide support for this client. Please contact its maintainers for support.
Release Notes
Dependencies
.NETStandard 2.0
- System.Memory(>= 4.5.3)
Used By
NuGet packages (112)
Showing the top 5 NuGet packages that depend on SQLitePCLRaw.core: Pimp your screen 2 2 download free.
| Package | Downloads |
|---|---|
| Microsoft.Data.Sqlite.Core Microsoft.Data.Sqlite is a lightweight ADO.NET provider for SQLite. This package does not include a copy of the native SQLite library.Commonly Used Types:Microsoft.Data.Sqlite.SqliteCommandMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite.SqliteConnectionMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite.SqliteConnectionStringBuilderMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite.SqliteDataReaderMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite.SqliteExceptionMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite.SqliteFactoryMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite.SqliteParameterMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite.SqliteTransaction | 28.0M |
| SQLitePCLRaw.bundle_green This 'batteries-included' bundle brings in SQLitePCLRaw.core and the necessary stuff for certain common use cases. Call SQLitePCL.Batteries.Init(). Policy of this bundle: iOS=system SQLite, others=e_sqlite3 included. Note that this bundle is identical to bundle_e_sqlite3, except on iOS where it uses the system SQLite library instead of e_sqlite3. In other words, when you use this bundle in a cross-platform app, your app is not using the same SQLite build configuration on all platforms. | 22.6M |
| SQLitePCLRaw.provider.e_sqlite3.netstandard11 A SQLitePCL.raw 'provider' bridges the gap between SQLitePCLRaw.core and a particular instance of the native SQLite library. Install this package in your app project and call SQLitePCL.raw.SetProvider(new SQLitePCL.SQLite3Provider_e_sqlite3()); Depending on the platform, you may also need to add one of the SQLitePCLRaw.lib.* packages. Convenience packages are named SQLitePCLRaw.bundle_*. | 15.7M |
| SQLitePCLRaw.bundle_e_sqlite3 This 'batteries-included' bundle brings in SQLitePCLRaw.core and the necessary stuff for certain common use cases. Call SQLitePCL.Batteries.Init(). Policy of this bundle: e_sqlite3 included | 8.7M |
| SQLitePCLRaw.provider.dynamic_cdecl SQLitePCL.raw is a Portable Class Library (PCL) for low-level (raw) access to SQLite. Packages named 'SQLitePCLRaw.provider.*' (like this one) are 'plugins' that allow SQLitePCLRaw.core to access the native SQLite library. This provider dynamically loads the native library by name. | 7.7M |
GitHub repositories (42)
Showing the top 5 popular GitHub repositories that depend on SQLitePCLRaw.core:
| Repository | Stars |
|---|---|
| CodeHubApp/CodeHub CodeHub is an iOS application written using Xamarin | 23.0K |
| dotnet/efcore EF Core is a modern object-database mapper for .NET. It supports LINQ queries, change tracking, updates, and schema migrations. | 9.6K |
| microsoft/VFSForGit Virtual File System for Git: Enable Git at Enterprise Scale | 5.3K |
| xamarin/xamarin-forms-samples Sample apps built using the Xamarin.Forms framework | 3.5K |
| ferventdesert/Hawk | 2.8K |
Version History
| Version | Downloads | Last updated |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0.4 | 66,616 | 9/3/2020 |
| 2.0.4-pre20200828111558 | 221 | 8/28/2020 |
| 2.0.3 | 516,734 | 5/1/2020 |
| 2.0.2 | 5,726,849 | 11/1/2019 |
| 2.0.2-pre20191018090318 | 1,340 | 10/18/2019 |
| 2.0.2-pre20191003102319 | 943 | 10/3/2019 |
| 2.0.2-pre20190904113843 | 2,218 | 9/4/2019 |
| 2.0.1 | 204,356 | 9/3/2019 |
| 2.0.0 | 1,712,028 | 8/5/2019 |
| 2.0.0-pre20190628101813 | 54,665 | 6/28/2019 |
| 2.0.0-pre20190625090255 | 4,292 | 6/25/2019 |
| 2.0.0-pre20190621100518 | 417 | 6/21/2019 |
| 2.0.0-pre20190620134904 | 394 | 6/20/2019 |
| 1.1.14 | 424,355 | 6/5/2019 |
| 1.1.13 | 904,375 | 1/24/2019 |
| 1.1.12 | 6,032,244 | 12/19/2018 |
| 1.1.11 | 2,794,615 | 5/2/2018 |
| 1.1.10 | 127,424 | 3/28/2018 |
| 1.1.10-pre20180223200113 | 11,023 | 2/24/2018 |
| 1.1.9 | 222,995 | 11/13/2017 |
| 1.1.9-pre20170905093404 | 2,083 | 9/5/2017 |
| 1.1.8 | 484,677 | 8/3/2017 |
| 1.1.7 | 8,019,866 | 6/28/2017 |
| 1.1.7-pre20170619212538 | 726 | 6/20/2017 |
| 1.1.6 | 20,243 | 6/19/2017 |
| 1.1.5 | 873,234 | 5/1/2017 |
| 1.1.4 | 1,996 | 4/29/2017 |
| 1.1.3 | 68,634 | 4/19/2017 |
| 1.1.3-pre20170220084037 | 4,508 | 2/20/2017 |
| 1.1.2 | 2,437,694 | 1/4/2017 |
| 1.1.2-pre20161207051304 | 1,152 | 12/7/2016 |
| 1.1.1 | 39,401 | 11/30/2016 |
| 1.1.1-pre20161109081005 | 3,006 | 11/9/2016 |
| 1.1.0 | 533,491 | 10/3/2016 |
| 1.1.0-pre20160928150051 | 950 | 9/28/2016 |
| 1.0.1 | 94,233 | 9/20/2016 |
| 1.0.0 | 73,100 | 9/15/2016 |
| 1.0.0-pre20160912104037 | 992 | 9/12/2016 |
| 1.0.0-pre20160901085507 | 2,724 | 9/1/2016 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Q6600 vs 2450M among all CPUs
Benchmark performance using all cores |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Individual core benchmark performance |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Are you paying a premium for performance? |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
CPUBoss Score |
Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 |
| ||||
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 3,546.5 | vs | 41.8 | More than 84.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later |
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core |
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once |
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.52 GHz | vs | 2.94 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.87 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
| ||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor |
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required |
| Much better performance per watt | 19.45 pt/W | vs | 1.19 pt/W | More than 16.2x better performance per watt |
| Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 85.31W | 3x lower typical power consumption |
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 62.2 °C | More than 60% higher Maximum operating temperature |
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,403 | vs | 924 | More than 50% better PassMark (Single core) score |
| Newer | Jan, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2007 | Release date over 5 years later |
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | 3x lower annual home energy cost |
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | 3x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Core i5 2450M
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
Seasonality Core 2 4 5 X 4
GeekBench 3 (AES single core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
Seasonality Core 2 4 5g
summary | Core2 Quad Q6600 | vs | Core i5 2450M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| rPGA 988B | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 105W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.19 pt/W | 19.45 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 28.44W |
Seasonality Core 2 4 5th
details | Core2 Quad Q6600 | vs | Core i5 2450M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 9 | 25 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 62.2°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.52 GHz | 2.94 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | 2.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.52 GHz | 2.94 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,300 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 |
